top of page
Writer's pictureYolanda Durrah

Taboo Tuesday: The Hidden World of Sneaky Links and Intimacy Partners


Welcome to this week's Taboo Tuesday with Coach Yolanda Denise, where we dive into the sensitive and often unspoken topics that many women experience. Today, we're discussing a topic that is very controversial: being a "sneaky link" or having an intimacy partner without being in a committed relationship. This practice, while more common than you might think, remains shrouded in secrecy and judgment. Let's explore the reasons behind this choice, its effects, and why it remains such a taboo topic.


The Reality of Sneaky Links and Intimacy Partners


A "sneaky link" refers to a person with whom someone has a discreet, often secretive sexual relationship without the expectation of a traditional romantic commitment. Similarly, an intimacy partner is someone with whom one engages in physical relations without the attachments of a formal relationship. This arrangement can serve various needs and circumstances, particularly for women who have experienced trauma or are seeking financial support.


The Why

Healing from Trauma: Many women turn to casual relationships or intimacy partners as a way to navigate their healing process after experiencing trauma in previous relationships. The flexibility and lack of emotional entanglement in these arrangements allow them to regain control over their sexual and emotional lives without the pressure of a full commitment.


  • Statistics: According to the American Psychological Association, approximately 20% of women in the U.S. have experienced sexual trauma. For these women, non-committed intimacy can be a coping mechanism while they work through their emotional recovery.

Financial Support: Some women engage in sneaky link relationships for financial stability. These situation-



ships offer financial benefits without the complexities and expectations of a traditional relationship. This dynamic can provide immediate support, which might be necessary for women facing economic hardships.


  • Statistics: A survey by the Pew Research Center found that 25% of single mothers live below the poverty line. In such cases, the financial support from a situation-ship can be a significant, albeit controversial, means of economic survival.

The Effects


While these arrangements can meet certain needs, they also come with potential emotional and psychological impacts.


Emotional Ambiguity: The lack of clear boundaries in sneaky link relationships can lead to emotional confusion. Women might struggle with feelings of attachment despite the agreed-upon lack of commitment, leading to internal conflicts and potential emotional distress.


Social Stigma: Being involved in a sneaky link or having an intimacy partner without a relationship can carry a heavy social stigma. Women often face judgment from peers and society, which can exacerbate feelings of shame and isolation. The societal expectation for women to seek committed, monogamous relationships adds to this pressure.


  • Statistics: A study published in the Journal of Sex Research found that women are more likely to face social criticism for engaging in casual sex compared to men, highlighting the double standard that persists in our culture.



Empowerment vs. Exploitation: For some women, these arrangements can be empowering, providing a sense of control and independence. However, there is also a risk of exploitation, particularly in situations where financial dependency is involved. The power dynamics in such relationships can sometimes blur the lines between consensual agreements and exploitation.


The Taboo Nature of the Topic


The concept of sneaky links and intimacy partners without relationships remains taboo for several reasons. Traditional societal norms often dictate that women should seek long-term, committed relationships. Deviating from this norm is seen as unconventional and morally questionable. Furthermore, the association with financial transactions in some of these arrangements can invoke negative connotations, equating them with transactional sex work, which is heavily stigmatized.

The reluctance to openly discuss these topics perpetuates a cycle of secrecy and shame. Women may feel they cannot share their experiences without facing judgment, leading to a lack of support and understanding.


Conclusion


Being a sneaky link or having an intimacy partner without being in a committed relationship is a multifaceted issue that intersects with trauma, financial need, and personal choice. While these arrangements can serve specific needs, they also carry potential emotional and societal consequences.


It's important to "Fix Your Crown" instead of taking this route. Focus on getting your mind healthy and establishing a relationship with yourself and your self-respect. Being intentional in developing a healthy relationship with yourself is crucial. Stand in your high heels with high standards and love yourself first. Financial independence and emotional healing should come from a place of self-love and empowerment, not from temporary fixes that might lead to more significant issues down the road.


By addressing the barriers women face and taking proactive steps to build a healthy relationship with oneself, we can create a future where every woman stands strong and empowered. Let’s break the taboo and start talking about financial and emotional empowerment for women.


Join the conversation! Have you or someone you know experienced being a sneaky link or having an intimacy partner? How did it affect you, and what insights can you share? Let's talk openly and support each other through these complex experiences.


Stay tuned for more insights and discussions next Tuesday on In Your Ear with Coach Yolanda Denise, where we continue to tackle the taboo topics that matter most to you.


Coach Yolanda for My Human Diary Relationship Coaching LLC

Master Self-Care & Healing Coach

Certified Self-Healing, Empowerment, Therapeutic Art, Transformation, Mindfulness, Focus Mastery+Breakthrough, & Group Life Coach.

2 views0 comments

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page